Lenney,
C.J. (2003). Sightseeking: Clues to the
landscape history of New England. Lebanon, NH: University Press of New England.
Scope: Lenney
explores the place names, boundaries and townplans, roads, houses and
gravestones. New England is rich in history
and the geography and topography of the area have helped define the history and
development of this region. It is also greatly influenced by the British
settlers and by the Native Americans who originally inhabited this land. This book does not capture the entire
richness of the area’s geography and focuses greatly on the Massachusetts area.
Lenney addresses the history of the region and the role that the settlers and
technology have played in shaping the local topography. It addresses how
changes in technology can change the region, such as the development of the
train and car and how the geography could be reorganized to accommodate the new
technology. This is a fascinating
approach to geography and one that I had not considered before. He also addresses the influence of the
settlers in naming cities and towns in the region. As the name New England would suggest, the
English settlers have greatly influenced the area.
And while he addresses the invention of the
train and cars and their effects on roads he does not address how such
industries as the textile industry defined Southeastern Massachusetts or the
whaling industry. It does not address
the influence of farming or the lumber industry in Northern New England. And
while he briefly touches upon the coastal communities, it is a brief
assessment. The ocean, the beaches and
the effects of the weather, tourism, and the industries surrounding the ocean
affect so many coastal communities, it is surprising that these aspects did not
take a greater role in this book. Lenney
does not address current developments in the region, such as the biomedical
corridor near Boston, where many corporations and innovative companies have
settled and not only have restructured the area north of Boston but have also
restructured business in the region and helped develop the economy.
The history presented is more pre-industrial
and industrial age than post industrial or modern. However, this book cannot be dismissed
because of the omissions. The aspects
addressed within Sightseeking are
quite fascinating. It provides an
interesting, if not limited history of New England geography.
Audience: The title would suggest that this book is
written for those who want to travel to New England and explore the geography
and history of the region. Yet, this
book is written for those who already possess knowledge of history and
geography. I would recommend this book
for both those studying history and geography.
It may be a tougher read for lower level undergraduates but it is not
out of reach.
Timeliness: As
a historical resource, it is still relevant ten years later. It would be interesting to read additional
books addressing other areas of impact on the geography of the region.
Authority: Christopher J. Lenney is a lifelong
New England resident and has worked for twenty years at the Harvard College
library. The Harvard Library website
lists him as a Reserves assistant. I was
unable to find much information regarding Lenney’s background but with a long
history within the Harvard College library and a familiarity with the region,
he speaks with authority of the local history and geography.
Documentation:
As one would expect
with a book written by a Harvard library staff member, there is an extensive
bibliography, nineteen pages total.
Relevance:
This resource is relevant to both history, anthropology and geography
majors.
References:
Harvard University.
(2013, November 16). HCL staff
directory- Lamont Library- Harvard College Library. Retrieved from http://www.hcl.harvard.edu/staff_directory/browse.cfm?ld_id=8
This resource might also be of interest to economists. It's interesting how the social sciences interact to the point that the same resource could be chosen by different students in different modules. I almost chose an Ohio geographic encyclopedia, as I thought I might be able to assess it better as an Ohio native, but it was more dated than I liked, mainly due to economic changes in the past five years. Your New England resource still sounds very useful.
ReplyDelete