- Humanists tend to work alone
- Humanists need to browse
- Humanists use a variety of approaches to their materials, often borrowing methods associated with disciplines other than their own
- Humanists need a wide range of primary materials, but books and journals are the most frequently used formats (Dalton & Charnigo, 2004, 404)
I was really struck by the idea of serendipity in the searching process. The idea that one just happens upon the key piece of information. This would explain the importance of browsing by the historian in the information seeking process. It also reminds me of Bates' theory of berrypicking. The approach to information seeking is not often linear. The search can lead one down different paths as one follows the spark of interest in browsing. After all, during the information seeking process, one may realize that a particular question must be answered before one can move on in the original search. That answer may redirect the search in a new direction or return it to the original path. This idea of serendipity is quite appealing and while Dalton and Charnigo state, "Serendipity may not happen often, but when it does, it is likely to turn up something of major importance." (2004, 410). I would love to know how often serendipity is just interpreted as part of the information seeking process and not recognized as a pivotal, unsought moment.
References:
Bates, M. (1989). The design of browsing and berry picking techniques for the online search interface. Retrieved from http://comminfo.rutgers.edu/~tefko/Courses/e530/Readings/Bates_Berrypicking.pdf.
Dalton, M.S. and Charnigo, L. (2004, Sept). Historians and their information sources. Retrieved from http://lis60621-09f.iwiki.kent.edu/file/view/Historians%20and%20their%20information%20resources.pdf/356238370/Historians%20and%20their%20information%20resources.pdf.
The serendipity, 'by accident" component struck me, too. The berry picking model is my information model of choice, but life and other tasks generally interfere with my personal preferences. I'm not sure as to your final thought.....some might consider a discovery the prize in the big cereal box that just takes a massive amount of effort to sift and find. I like to think most individuals would recognize the serendipity moment, or even consider the unexpected information 'find' an instance of grace.....unsought, unearned gift.
ReplyDeleteIn my research experience, we more often than not attribute that stroke of luck in our research to just that and do not give much thought about the formal process. I think that the berry picking model is a natural research path. For historians, who often work alone and not collaboratively, this is of particular note. There is not a lot of opportunity to bounce ideas off of others, so I can see why this could be particularly noteworthy in their search process.
ReplyDelete